FOREWORD Dr. Jampolsky explains how to deliver a lecture, present a scientific paper, write an article, or communicate verbally: "first you tell 'em what you're going to tell 'em, then you tell 'em, then you tell 'em what you told 'em." I will tell you what you know but may not agree with: the world is much more us and them than us against them; conflict is a form of cooperation; we are all members of one another. To avoid arguments I should avoid discussing politics, religion, sex, and music; I add economics, race, and gender to that list. Naturally I will expose my feelings about all these. There are three kinds of truth: things that are true whether or not spoken of, such as sunup; things true only if spoken, "foul ball"; things only true if unspoken, "check's in the mail", which if spoken are called lies. WHO I have been a lot of different people and that led to this book. As I write this I am 70 years old but inside I still feel about 14. These lives, events, and choices have interested me and I think will amuse you. My "WHO" should be made clear by the autobiographical notes that start each section. WHAT The "WHAT's" are the conclusions I reached from being in so many different bags. Most of you have not had this many opportunities to take part in this many cultures. I got to hot-walk some outstanding race horses, fool with gamecocks who were determined to kill their fellows, be in ensembles with outstanding musicians and actors, do cutting edge scientific stuff, and stand behind a catcher who was receiving 90 mph fast balls which he hoped I would greet with "strike." These lives have things in common that I hope to persuade you are universal truths about your own humanity and that of your fellow travelers on our "spaceship earth." WHEN It starts when there were daily knocks on the door by men who were willing to work for a meal and extends to when people stand by the road with "work for food" signs. The punctuations of war and pendulum swings of fashion mark points along the way. WHERE I have lived a geographically insular life, never having been to Europe. I was a sailor in the Philippines, a tourist in Mexico and Polynesia, and a musician and scientist in Canada.. Otherwise I haven't left the USA. WHY I have always headed straight for my heart's desire. I never took a job I didn't love. I never passed GO or collected $200. I write this as a laxative to relieve myself of a constipation of ideas. The purpose is to infect you with the disease of universal brotherhood. HOW I loosely arrange the essays into groups defined by physical characteristics (Sighted White Male Young Old Smart), career choices (Arbiter Oddsmaker Musician Director Horseman Cockfighter), or a combination of nature and nurture (Ethnic Rich Straight). I am a cultural anthropologist without portfolio and I will show you no stinking badges, references, or footnotes. ARGUMENT...for whom is this written My purpose in discussing others is to push through our preconceptions and bigotry to an appreciation of people with different labels. The divisions between men/women, whites/blacks, hip/square resist healing just like those between Protestant/Catholic Irish, Serb/Muslim Yugoslavs, or Arab/Jewish Semites. The symptoms range from rhetoric to murder. Maybe if we examine enough misconceptions about "outsiders" we will find cures for our bad attitudes and prejudices. The theory is that knowledge of something reduces its mystery and terror. If you "get it" you will get over being a slave to an idea that tastes bitter. Psychoanalysis is based on this theory and it may not always work perfectly, but we are going to try it out. Recently a man who was a member of a "white supremacist" group had his values changed when his son was born with a cleft palate and others in the group urged him to exterminate the boy. His transformation extended to the "Negro Issue" and even a sympathy for women's rights. Because I changed through living with or paying attention to different cultures, I believe this may help you open your mind (and heart?). Some of these subcultures are majorities, some reviled, some pitied. They all experience exclusion from the mainstream. My trigger was experiences with blind friends. The title piece outlines the sorts of separation I hope to "heal." We may not understand how demeaning our pity can be. Alan Myerson asked in relation to theatrical work "what's this about?": this is about the joys of privilege without the selfishness of exclusivity. Shared privileges are enhanced by the sharing. As we change from hunters & gatherers or farmers & animal husbanders to become consumers & spectators - from being subjects of the king into being customers - we can see that beauty is not spoiled by the gaze of the mob. Except for Greek Letter Fraternities and Country Clubs, our cultures welcome new members, even if we don't actively recruit them. Many groups suffer discrimination; I examine some I am in or close to whose problems arise from their exclusion. The problems blind people have because they cannot see are distinct from the difficulties sighted people impose. I don't know if this imposition is because of unfamiliarity and insensitivity or if we insist that we keep some people "in their place" to enhance our privilege. We all bridle at our enslavement as children, but as we mature we lose our rage and renege on our vows to do something about it when we become the enslavers. As we age we endure society's "old folks" attitudes. In youth we create a new language and other secret places to avoid the stupidity of our elders; as "seniors" we put up with weirdness and bide our time until we exit. Some of my cultures are by their nature exclusive - you can use just so many baseball umpires. I want my experiences in these things to give you the feeling of what it's like and how that relates to your own experiences. Maybe you will try some cultural expansion beyond your present horizons. Even if you only take part as a spectator, you become a participant. I hope the reader shares my privilege. The writer gets to experience absolute exclusivity!